As the monsoon season gets over, the debate over monsoon
predictions get louder. This time the
India Meteorological Department (IMD) had forecast a normal monsoon, predicting
a 97 percent rainfall (countrywide) of the long period average (LPA). The monsoon season however ended, on 30th
June, with a 9.4 percent deficit of this projection, making the IMD forecast off
more than 4 percent margin of error.
This also means, the projection of ‘normal monsoon’ did not
come out true as the monsoon ended up being ‘below normal’. Less than 10 percent of LPA is considered ‘deficient.’ This year’s monsoon has been almost a ‘deficient’
one. It is argued that private weather
forecast agencies such as SkyMet have been more accurate this time on certain
counts. http://bit.ly/2O0i3YT
We certainly need more accurate rainfall projections so that
farmers can adapt to the variations. IMD’s
region wise projections have come up more accurate than others. However, that does not really mean that
farmers benefit a lot. Take for example
the crop failure and insurance claims against that. The farmers are still at mercy of an ineffective
system of monitoring, that deprives them of their genuine claims. India has
miles to go on this.
Ranjan Panda
Convenor, Combat Climate Change Network, India
Email: ranjanpanda@gmail.com
Skype: ranjan.climatecrusader
Tweets @ranjanpanda
Tweets @MahanadiRiver
No comments:
Post a Comment